Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring
This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.
- See this guide for instructions on creating diffs for this report.
- If you see that a user may be about to violate the three-revert rule, consider warning them by placing {{subst:uw-3rr}} on their user talk page.
You must notify any user you have reported.
You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.
You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
- Additional notes
- When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
- The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
- Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
- Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.
- Definition of edit warring
- Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)
Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.
| Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs. |
User:SR4381 reported by User:EarthDude (Result: Blocked 24 hours)
[edit]Page: Gyanesh Kumar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: SR4381 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to: [1]
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning: [6]
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page: [7]
Diff of ANEW notice posted to user's talk page: [8]
Comments:
The editor has been edit warring at Gyanesh Kumar, a BLP article. Their edits have included violations of WP:NPOV, unexplained removal of sources, changing content without adding or changing the sources with them, adding promotional content sourced to a news article which mentions none of the things that the content states, among others. When told to gain consensus at talk per WP:ONUS, and warned of edit warring. They then decided to take the matter to WP:ANI and accused me of vandalism, even though their content had been reverted by several other editors. They have continued edit warring even while the discussion is ongoing. — EarthDude (Talk) 17:52, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
Blocked – for a period of 24 hours ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:39, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
User:Jovan.orthodoxy reported by User:AirshipJungleman29 (Result: Blocked 24 hours)
[edit]Page: Saint Naum (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Jovan.orthodoxy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- 16:04, 31 March 2026 (UTC) "Undoing previous change — reverted to reflect commonly cited sources; maintaining neutral wording with historical context."
- Consecutive edits made from 11:48, 31 March 2026 (UTC) to 13:23, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
- 11:48, 31 March 2026 (UTC) ""
- 13:15, 31 March 2026 (UTC) "Removed ethnic references to focus on historical and religious context; added citation for Ohrid Archbishopric."
- 13:20, 31 March 2026 (UTC) "Reworded early life section to use historical regional names instead of modern national terms; added academic source for Moesia reference."
- 13:23, 31 March 2026 (UTC) "Reworded the final sentence to replace modern national references with historical context, using ‘First Bulgarian Empire’ to maintain accuracy and neutrality."
- Consecutive edits made from 21:18, 30 March 2026 (UTC) to 21:23, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
- 21:18, 30 March 2026 (UTC) "The content here is the same as before; I only clarified wording and consolidated repeated sentences. No information was removed, and all statements remain fully sourced. I don’t understand why it is being called “not detailed enough,” since the factual content is unchanged."
- 21:23, 30 March 2026 (UTC) "Replaced "Christianization" with "introduction of Christianity" for clarity; original text not written by me, all sources unchanged"
- Consecutive edits made from 20:46, 30 March 2026 (UTC) to 21:03, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
- 20:46, 30 March 2026 (UTC) "The recent revert claims this edit was LLM-generated. However, the changes consist of minor wording improvements and consolidation of repeated sentences from existing text. All information is fully sourced (Fine 1991; Obolensky 1994; Kantor 1983). This edit was not AI-generated, it is simply a clean, neutral rewrite for clarity, readability, and to remove repetition. I’ve cited all statements with reliable sources."
- 21:03, 30 March 2026 (UTC) "Improved wording to make sentences more natural and readable; retained all citations and historical information"
- Consecutive edits made from 20:30, 30 March 2026 (UTC) to 20:40, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
- 20:30, 30 March 2026 (UTC) "Changed “Bulgarian” to “Slavic” per sources; refers to political context, not ethnicity."
- 20:40, 30 March 2026 (UTC) "Adjusted wording to avoid anachronistic national labels; clarified geographic context"
- 14:35, 30 March 2026 (UTC) ""
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
- 15:24, 31 March 2026 (UTC) "/* Saint Naum NOT ETHNICALLY "BULGARIAN" */ disruptive editing"
Comments:
Blocked – for a period of 24 hours The Bushranger One ping only 17:29, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
User:~2026-18730-58 reported by User:Trailblazer101 (Result: Already blocked)
[edit]Page: The Punisher: One Last Kill (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: ~2026-18730-58 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- Consecutive edits made from 02:37, 1 April 2026 (UTC) to 02:38, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
- 02:37, 1 April 2026 (UTC) "/* Premise */"
- 02:38, 1 April 2026 (UTC) ""
- 02:36, 1 April 2026 (UTC) ""
- Consecutive edits made from 23:15, 31 March 2026 (UTC) to 23:16, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
- 23:15, 31 March 2026 (UTC) "/* Premise */Added the actual synopsis"
- 23:16, 31 March 2026 (UTC) ""
- Consecutive edits made from 22:30, 31 March 2026 (UTC) to 22:31, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
- 22:30, 31 March 2026 (UTC) "/* Premise */"
- 22:31, 31 March 2026 (UTC) ""
- Consecutive edits made from 21:31, 31 March 2026 (UTC) to 21:31, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
- 21:31, 31 March 2026 (UTC) "/* Premise */"
- 21:31, 31 March 2026 (UTC) ""
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
- 00:05, 1 April 2026 (UTC) "Notice: Avoiding copyright problems on The Punisher: One Last Kill."
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Comments:
Clearly not listening and unwilling to communicate. — Trailblazer101🔥 (discuss · contribs) 03:01, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
Already blocked ~ ToBeFree (talk) 06:45, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
Edit warring by ~2026-20163-49
[edit]User is repeatedly reverting my government backed sourced edit without explanation and providing any sources.Also he has been doing unnecessary edits without any sources in other pages too with different IPs. I asked him respectfully to add sources, i thought after adding government backed source he will understand but he is reverting again and again.( Sites ending with "gov.in" are official government website in india).
My edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Himachal_Pradesh&diff=prev&oldid=1346528265
User reverts: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Himachal_Pradesh&diff=prev&oldid=1346525995 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Himachal_Pradesh&diff=prev&oldid=1346484297 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Himachal_Pradesh&diff=prev&oldid=1346484051 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Himachal_Pradesh&diff=prev&oldid=1346483376 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Himachal_Pradesh&diff=prev&oldid=1346553705 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Himachal_Pradesh&diff=prev&oldid=1346553116
Source used: http://himachalpr.gov.in/OnePressRelease.aspx?ID=8247&Language=1
Please review.
Notifying User talk:~2026-20163-49 ZenryokuZenkai (talk) 15:55, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
Page protected ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:06, 1 April 2026 (UTC)- Hello ZenryokuZenkai, in the future, please use the "Click here to create a new report" link at the top of this noticeboard. Future reports that don't use this form may be removed or declined. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:06, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks for handling the situation and for the guidance. I’ll use the proper reporting form next time. ZenryokuZenkai (talk) 18:12, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
User:Semsûrî reported by User:EmirhanBulut16 (Result: Page protected indefinitely under CTOPS)
[edit]Page: Kovancılar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kovanc%C4%B1lar&diff=prev&oldid=1305400788
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kovanc%C4%B1lar&diff=prev&oldid=1245850087
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kovanc%C4%B1lar&diff=prev&oldid=1261576078
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kovanc%C4%B1lar&diff=prev&oldid=1304592091
Comments:
User:Semsürî is repeatedly reverting edits on the Kovancılar page without establishing consensus. The edits remove or alter sourced information and appear to be disruptive.
User:Semsürî is repeatedly inserting and restoring information that appears to be inaccurate, despite explanations and evidence provided in edit summaries.
The name "Kovancılar", as supported by available sources, was given by Turkish migrants who came from Romania in 1934. The name is a direct transfer from the original place name in Romania, and therefore does not have an equivalent in another language.
I have attempted to explain this and provide clarification, but the user continues to revert my edits without addressing the sources or engaging in meaningful discussion.
This behavior is disruptive and does not align with Wikipedia's principles of verifiability and consensus. I request that the edits be reviewed and appropriate action be taken.
I request administrator intervention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EmirhanBulut16 (talk • contribs) 21:01, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
Page protected, indefinite extended-confirmed by The Bushranger as falling under WP:CT/KURD. Edit warring was months ago and stale and inactionable. Daniel Case (talk) 02:30, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
User:Joe malone17 reported by User:4TheWynne (Result: Blocked for now)
[edit]Page: Dustin Martin (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Joe malone17 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
- Consecutive edits made from 20:17, 1 April 2026 (UTC) to 20:32, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
- 20:17, 1 April 2026 (UTC) "Career highlights & accomplishments corrected"
- 20:32, 1 April 2026 (UTC) ""
- Consecutive edits made from 13:07, 31 March 2026 (UTC) to 13:10, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
- 07:42, 31 March 2026 (UTC) "Why wouldn’t you add the Lou Richard’s medal or Herald Sun Player of the year like you have with daicos, Ablett and Selwood? Why don’t you wanna add 2x under 22 team which you have with multiple others? Why don’t you wanna add the countless awards he achieved at Richmond like other pages? I’m actually helping you enhance your page and maybe just because your a Geelong or Collingwood supporter I’m honouring a far greater player so suck it up princess"
Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning:
- 05:29, 31 March 2026 (UTC) "/* March 2026 */"
Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
- 20:31, 1 April 2026 (UTC) on User talk:4TheWynne "/* Dustin Martin */ new section"
Comments:
This user is continually adding excessive content to Dustin Martin's article despite being warned (you'll see that they've received several notices over the last year, so doesn't appear to be learning) and several requests to discuss at the article talk page or project level. As I explained to them, there was a set of achievements for individual players that was agreed upon at project level (awards of significance such as All-Australian team, club best and fairest, etc.), with other things like minor club awards (e.g. fifth place in club B&F) or fan/media-voted awards (e.g. 22under22 team) considered unnecessary, but they've been ignoring this and adding them back. Only just today did they reach out to me directly (though not to discuss in any meaningful way, in my opinion), but not at the article talk page or at project level as requested (should be noted that I wasn't the only person to revert this user's edits); comments like this one aren't super helpful either. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 00:58, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
Blocked for now. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:47, 2 April 2026 (UTC)