Wikipedia talk:Guidance for younger editors
Add topic| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Guidance for younger editors page. |
|
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
| This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Minimum age
[edit]What's the minimum age for adding personal information, like age, location, real name, without getting suppressed? CreatorTheWikipedian2009 (talk) 18:22, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- That's a loaded question with about a half-dozen different answers, all variants of "it depends on the situation". The very simplistic answer is that there is no minimum age; I have suppressed content posted by 11-year-olds and I have suppressed personal information written by 40-year-olds (though admittedly the older one gets the less likely they are to post personal information).
- However, to get to the hidden question in your question, the WMF considers anyone under 16 to be a minor, which means the OS team treats any personal content from someone below this threshold as suppress-on-sight. If someone is over this age, and posts simple/non-trackable information such as a DOB or general location, it will likely stay un-suppressed, but again I have suppressed information about college-age students and older where they simply gave too much personal information which would allow someone to actually know their physical location.
- On the Internet, nobody knows you're a dog, but at the same time they shouldn't know how to find you. The advice I usually give is to think about what you really want people to know about you; things like your location and real name will very, very, very rarely fall into that category. Primefac (talk) 01:05, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Ok, what simple/non-trackable information? CreatorTheWikipedian2009 (talk) 09:02, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- I am not going to give you an answer to that. Different people find different types of information to be public enough to share, and if I give you a list you'll give exactly that information anyway. Think about if you met a total stranger on the street; what would you feel comfortable sharing with them? Primefac (talk) 00:08, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
- I don't know. CreatorTheWikipedian2009 (talk) 08:41, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
- late reply but i believe its 16 on the age part ~2026-90349-5 (talk) 20:18, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
- I don't know. CreatorTheWikipedian2009 (talk) 08:41, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
- I am not going to give you an answer to that. Different people find different types of information to be public enough to share, and if I give you a list you'll give exactly that information anyway. Think about if you met a total stranger on the street; what would you feel comfortable sharing with them? Primefac (talk) 00:08, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
- Ok, what simple/non-trackable information? CreatorTheWikipedian2009 (talk) 09:02, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
"Many young editors forget our purpose and obsess over popularity, fame, attention, and more"
[edit]C'mon, now. Is this really accurate? Seems like an over-generalization of an entire group of editors, in my opinion. — EF5 01:23, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- Yeaj I think it should be changed. FaviFake (talk) 18:10, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
- That is true of many editors, whatever their age. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:36, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
- @Phil Bridger: that's true, but pinning the problem on young editors specifically is, as I stated above, a bad-faith interpretation of a large group of people. EF5 13:44, 4 December 2025 (UTC)
- That is true of many editors, whatever their age. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:36, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
No legal way of your password to yourself if you are under 18
[edit]My parents want to have a look at my phone and I can't legally refuse so I have to give my phone which means giving my Wikipedia password. So should this essay say parents are exempt from the password. Can Parents Legally Do This? ~2025-36403-94 (talk) 23:36, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
- I added some info in the page. Thank you for the suggestion ~2025-36455-95 (talk) 23:47, 25 November 2025 (UTC)
- All rules here and in real life apply to free will. The rules don't apply when coercion is involved. Johnuniq (talk) 06:01, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
Reduce number of banners at the top
[edit]This article is intended for people less familiar with Wikipedia UI. I think the use of three banners at the top might hamper that goal. Is it possible for us to trim them down? Abandeali (talk) 05:25, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
- Hrm... second and third banners do somewhat mirror each other. Primefac (talk) 22:30, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
- just made this as simple as possible. Moxy🍁 23:53, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
- I appreciate the goal of simplifying, but I added back the essay banner. Since we have so many pages in the Wikipedia namespace that reflect widely varying levels of consensus, it's helpful to clearly indicate essay/guidance/policy status in a standardized way. Dreamyshade (talk) 00:44, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
- just made this as simple as possible. Moxy🍁 23:53, 8 April 2026 (UTC)
This page should be protected
[edit]This page isn't even protected. Us temporary accounts can edit it. It should be protected that only confirmed users can edit. Someone else needs to do this. ~2026-37427-43 (talk) 03:02, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- many page watchers here Wikipedia:Give 'em enough rope Moxy🍁 03:26, 16 July 2026 (UTC)
- The last time an unregistered user edited this page was January, and the edit wasn't reverted, so... no; we don't preemptively protect pages. Primefac (talk) 11:37, 18 July 2026 (UTC)
