Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Society, sports, and culture

The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention: You can sign up to receive a user talk page invitation to participate in discussions of interest to you, see Wikipedia:Feedback request service

Talk:James Fishback

How should James Fishback's relationship with white supremacy and white nationalism be covered on the page?

1. Affirmative: Yes, in the first sentence.
2. Affirmative: Yes, in the opening paragraphs. Not as a description in the first sentence.
3. Affirmative: Yes, but not in introduction. Include in political beliefs section.
4. Against: Contextualized as allegations; shouldn't be in Wikivoice or frame it as a debate between two sides.
5. Against: Shouldn't be mentioned at all.

Will include my argument soon. Jollyrime (talk) 03:34, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Talk:Dhurandhar: The Revenge

Is it due to label Dhurandhar: The Revenge as "propaganda" in the lead sentence? 01:52, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Talk:Cascadia movement

Should the Doug flag (File:Doug flag.svg) be included in this article under a non-free use rationale? If so, where in the article should it be displayed? –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:10, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Talk:September 11 attacks

Which collage should be used in the infobox for this article? Sdkb ^talk 19:41, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Talk:Big Mac

Which of these photos should be used in the infobox? Belbury (talk) 15:44, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Talk:Sfenj

Should the infobox "Place of origin" field for Sfenj be changed from "Al-Andalus" to "Morocco" or "Maghreb"? Bohosquare1 (talk) 15:19, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Talk:Shebakia

Should the infobox "Place of origin" field be changed from "Ottoman Empire" to "Morocco" or "Morocco/Maghreb"? Bohosquare1 (talk) 10:03, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Talk:Twin Peaks: Fire Walk with Me

When reliable sources disagree about a fact, but the evidence generally leans towards one side, how should we represent the fact in the lead? Namelessposter (talk) 13:41, 3 March 2026 (UTC)