User talk:~2026-42949-06

Welcome!

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

You are welcome to edit without logging in; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages and upload media).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

If you have any questions, ; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

Happy editing! Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:37, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

August 2026

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for block evasion.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.  Izno (talk) 21:24, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

~2026-42949-06 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Athanelar, i understand why you think that i'm the same person as that LTA user. However, i explicitly refuted your central belief. In the previous discussion on your talk page (I noticed you blocked my discussion, i understand why you think that i'm the same person as the LTA user because i talked about Astroganger, but...), i didn't insulted, name-called, or said something like "you're idiot" or "i'm right, you're wrong". I didn't attacked your charectiristics or your authority of yourselfs. I didn't critisized your tone of your writing without adressing the substance of your argument. I didn't stated the opposite case without little or no supporting evidence. I didn't contradicted and then backing it up with reasoning and/or supporting evidence (which avoided the risk of strawman's fallacy). I didn't quoted your point of argument and explain why it's mistaken. I explictily refuted your central belief. I read the Graham's hierarchy of disagreement. Graham proposed a disagreement hierarchy in a 2008 essay "How to Disagree". He putted types of argument into a seven-point hierarchy and observed that "If moving up the disagreement hierarchy makes people less mean, that will make most of them happier." Graham also suggested that the hierarchy can be thought of as a pyramid, as the highest forms of disagreement are rarer. Following this hierarchy, Graham notes that articulate forms of name-calling (e.g., "The author is a self-important dilettante") are no different from crude insults. When in disagreement people often become more animated and engaged, and this leads to them becoming angry. At the lower levels, the attacks are directed against the person, which can be hateful. Higher levels of argument are directed against the idea, which is easier to recognize and accept. When people argue at the higher levels, the exchange of viewpoint is more informative and helpful. Refuting the central point is the highest type of argument in the Graham's hierarchy of disagreement. The image of Graham's hierarchy of disagreement is used on WP:NEGOTIATE. I'm not that LTA user. Thank you. ~2026-42949-06 (talk) 21:31, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. One open unblock request at a time; you had two. Yamla (talk) 21:44, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"I didn't set the Old Trails wildfire because I was to the west setting the Mitre Rock wildfire." Not terribly convincing. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{Look out it's Jimothy!} 22:21, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

~2026-42949-06 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Athanelar, please unblock me. I’m not the same person as the LTA user you’re referring to (the confusion stems from me talking about Astroganger). I’m happy to keep the discussion focused and follow WP guidelines going forward. Sorry for the cringe unblock request text i wrote on my user talk page. ~2026-42949-06 (talk) 21:39, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

It's pretty obvious that you're evading an earlier block. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:38, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I repeat what I said on my own talk page. I have no idea why you insist on continuing to make these incredibly poor attempts at evading your block instead of just working on actually becoming an editor in good standard. It'd be less effort and far less insulting to the people you expect to help you. Athanelar (talk) 03:40, 5 August 2026 (UTC)