User talk:RanulfLampard

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maids of Honour Row has been accepted

Maids of Honour Row, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

I₂Overcome ^talk 02:46, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Father Thames has been accepted

Father Thames, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Wikishovel (talk) 13:25, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Terrace and Buccleuch Gardens (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Josedimaria was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Lacks secondary sources that shows notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Terrace and Buccleuch Gardens and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

João^hola 21:49, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, RanulfLampard! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Joãohola 21:49, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prince's Head, Richmond (December 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MCE89 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Prince's Head, Richmond and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MCE89 (talk) 16:11, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Richmond Riverside has been accepted

Richmond Riverside, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MCE89 (talk) 16:32, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Prince's Head has been accepted

The Prince's Head, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MediaKyle (talk) 22:09, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Holly Village has been accepted

Holly Village, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Htanaungg (talk) 06:10, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi RanulfLampard. Thank you for your work on Mercato Metropolitano. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please establish notability as per WP:NBUILDING. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 09:59, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Terrace and Buccleuch Gardens has been accepted

Terrace and Buccleuch Gardens, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 06:39, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi RanulfLampard. Thank you for your work on RSPCA Fountain. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this page for a Grade II listed monument with a significant history, important for the area and its recognition of the RSPCA. It would now be helpful to link it from other articles (for example, integrating into Richmond Hill, London. Remember also to add categories when you create pages.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 19:11, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi RanulfLampard. Thank you for your work on Philip Twells Memorial Fountain. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for another article in your series of London landmarks. Again, it's worth linking this page from others so that readers can find this content.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 19:53, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi RanulfLampard. Thank you for your work on Plimsoll Memorial. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for another article; clearly written and focussed on the topic. Regarding the Historic England links, I recommend linking to the listing itself, rather than to what amounts to the search page - this should be more helpful for readers.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 19:58, 23 December 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi RanulfLampard. Thank you for your work on Statue of Charles Portal. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for this helpful new page in the series on Victoria Embankment memorials; it's clearly written and focussed, with 3 independent sources that cover the memorial rather than just its subject. It would now be helpful to link it from more pages than just one list. Note that an alternative approach would be to merge it to Charles Portal - just because a page can exist separately does not mean that readers are best served by having it separate.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 19:46, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your Trenchard statue article. Might I also suggest that you consider the Dowding statue outside St Clement Dames at some point? Kind regards Buckshot06 (talk) 00:46, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

Incredible work

Your contributions this month on public sculpture, important houses etc have been outstanding. I changed some of your NHLE references to use the template and I've added links to Commons categories where needed. Thank you so much once again. No Swan So Fine (talk) 15:30, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi RanulfLampard. Thank you for your work on Statue of Richard Cobden. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for adding to the collection of articles on the statues of London. I suppose that 'cheapest and worst' is a mark of some distinction in London - I'm not sure that the pigeons agree.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 01:08, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi RanulfLampard. Thank you for your work on Statue of Lord Byron. Another editor, Lijil, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for writing this article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lijil}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Lijil (talk) 03:54, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi RanulfLampard! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

-- 21:33, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

Nice work on Trafalgar Buildings, thank you! Fortek67 (talk) 16:34, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Duck Island Cottage

Thanks for posting Duck Island Cottage. There seems to scope for nominating it for WP:DIDYOUKNOW, given the dichotomy between its initial purpose and its later designation as a bomb-disposal site. There's a seven-day deadline for nominations.--AntientNestor (talk) 14:58, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the suggestion. I'm just wondering however where the year of designation comes from as I couldn't find it in the referenced source. RanulfLampard (talk) 15:48, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

You spotted my typo, thanks. Fixed. AntientNestor (talk) 16:13, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi RanulfLampard. Thank you for your work on Leonard Jennings (sculptor). Another editor, Tony Holkham, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

I have standardised the past tense, as usual WP style. More sources would be good, but fine for a stub.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Tony Holkham}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Tony Holkham (Talk) 23:22, 12 July 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi RanulfLampard. Thank you for your work on Edgar Allan Howes. Another editor, Tony Holkham, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

I notice the past tense is not used very much, which is odd for a biography of a dead person. I would change it as I have done with another of your articles, but it's up to you. Interesting article, anyway.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Tony Holkham}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Tony Holkham (Talk) 21:20, 13 July 2026 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Duck Island Cottage

Hello! Your submission of Duck Island Cottage at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! RoySmith (talk) 12:53, 20 July 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi RanulfLampard. Thank you for your work on Restaurant Gordon Ramsay High. Another editor, Gommeh, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

To be honest, before clicking on the article I thought it was going to be a high school named after him, haha.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Gommeh}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

In solidarity, Gommeh ^{(talk 🎮 sign)} 17:46, 23 July 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Duck Island Cottage

On 1 August 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Duck Island Cottage, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the bird keeper of Duck Island Cottage was also tasked with maintaining bomb-disposal equipment? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Duck Island Cottage. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (Duck Island Cottage), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 1 August 2026 (UTC)