User talk:CEJILCEJIL

July 2026

Hello, CEJILCEJIL. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things 2=you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. We ask that you:

• Avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors
• Disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI)
• Propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the Edit Request Wizard), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions
• Avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming)

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation for any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

See the FAQ for article subjects for more information.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Boud (talk) 23:23, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

August 2026

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.

Not only do your two main edits suggest that you have a conflict of interest with Viviana Krsticevic by the general style and content of editing, i.e. but by your username, you claim to be associated with CEJIL of which Krsticevic has been the director for a decade, and you removed substantial amounts of sourced material without any explanation, you introduced many WP:EXTERNALLINKs into the main text, you added unsourced statements, and the WP:EDITSUMMARY of the second of those two edits, "I updated general information", is misleading: what you did was not an update, it was a complete rewrite, almost entirely ignoring the previous content and sources.

I have no idea if you are really associated with CEJIL or not, but lawyers, especially lawyers "for justice and human rights", should understand the concepts of evidence and ethics.

• If you are in fact associated with Krsticevic or CEJIL, then I strongly suggest that you avoid the long-term embarrassment of persisting with undeclared COI editing. Politicians can engage in manipulative behaviour and get elected as the president of the United States. For human rights lawyers, engaging in manipulative behaviour on the public record is much more risky. See the guidelines above for ethically acceptable COI editing.
• If you are not associated with Krsticevic or CEJIL, then I recommend that you first try doing a few small edits while you learn about Wikipedia editing.

Boud (talk) 06:42, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Joyous!. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Viviana Krsticevic, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Your edit removed all of the sourced material, and replaced it with content that has no sources. It's very important that readers be able to verify information by checking the reliable published source that supports it. Joyous! Noise! 14:37, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. This was your fourth unconstructive editing of the Viviana Krsticevic page. Boud (talk) 19:24, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, website, or role, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

1. Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
2. Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
3. Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
4. Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. If you are having trouble, you may want to try using the unblock wizard.

Before requesting a new username, check if it is still available. If the search says "There is no global account for [username]", the username is free to use.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the edit. Kj cheetham (talk) 19:43, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

CEJILCEJIL (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

LRODRISAC (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I work for CEJIL, but editing Wikipedia is not part of my job and I am not paid to edit Wikipedia.

I understand that using the username "CEJILCEJIL" was not appropriate because it gave the impression that I was representing the organization, and I also understand that directly editing the biography of CEJIL's Executive Director created a conflict of interest.

My intention was not to advertise or promote CEJIL or the individual. I wanted to correct and update factual information. I now understand Wikipedia's policies on conflict of interest, promotional editing, and usernames.

If I am unblocked, I will not directly edit articles related to CEJIL or its staff. Instead, I will suggest factual, well-sourced changes on article talk pages and allow independent editors to decide whether to make those changes.

I respectfully request a username change to: LRODRISAC.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

CEJILCEJIL (talk) 17:48, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This unblock request appears to have been written by a chatbot using a large language model. The purpose of unblock requests is to determine whether you, the human operating this account, understand why you were blocked – not to test a chatbot's ability to tell us what we want to hear. A message written (or rewritten) by a chatbot can also cause you to sound like you're making empty promises. It is better to write the unblock request yourself. Please read through the guide to appealing blocks for more help. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:15, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

This user is asking to be unblocked to request a change in username.

CEJILCEJIL (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

LRODRISAC (talk · account availability check · rename user)

Request reason:

Hello. I understand why my account was blocked, and I understand the concerns about my username and the conflict of interest.

I work for CEJIL. I edited the article about Viviana Krsticevic because she is the Executive Director of CEJIL and I noticed that the article contained outdated information and parts that were not well written. My intention was to correct and update factual information, not to advertise or promote CEJIL or Ms. Krsticevic.

I now understand that, because I work for CEJIL, I should be more careful when editing articles related to the organization or its staff. In the future, when I need to suggest corrections to those articles, I will use the article talk pages and provide reliable independent sources so that other editors can review the proposed changes.

I also understand that the username "CEJILCEJIL" was not appropriate because it looks like an official organizational account. I would like to change my username to LRODRISAC.

Thank you for taking the time to reconsider my request.

CEJILCEJIL (talk) 10:25, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Administrators should consider discussing any unblock with the blocking administrator (see the blocking policy).

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, please replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-un on hold | 1=blocking administrator | 2=LRODRISAC | 3=Hello. I understand why my account was blocked, and I understand the concerns about my username and the conflict of interest.

I work for CEJIL. I edited the article about Viviana Krsticevic because she is the Executive Director of CEJIL and I noticed that the article contained outdated information and parts that were not well written. My intention was to correct and update factual information, not to advertise or promote CEJIL or Ms. Krsticevic.

I now understand that, because I work for CEJIL, I should be more careful when editing articles related to the organization or its staff. In the future, when I need to suggest corrections to those articles, I will use the article talk pages and provide reliable independent sources so that other editors can review the proposed changes.

I also understand that the username "CEJILCEJIL" was not appropriate because it looks like an official organizational account. I would like to change my username to LRODRISAC.

Thank you for taking the time to reconsider my request.

CEJILCEJIL (talk) 10:25, 5 August 2026 (UTC) | 4=~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following:

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=LRODRISAC | reason=Hello. I understand why my account was blocked, and I understand the concerns about my username and the conflict of interest.

I work for CEJIL. I edited the article about Viviana Krsticevic because she is the Executive Director of CEJIL and I noticed that the article contained outdated information and parts that were not well written. My intention was to correct and update factual information, not to advertise or promote CEJIL or Ms. Krsticevic.

I now understand that, because I work for CEJIL, I should be more careful when editing articles related to the organization or its staff. In the future, when I need to suggest corrections to those articles, I will use the article talk pages and provide reliable independent sources so that other editors can review the proposed changes.

I also understand that the username "CEJILCEJIL" was not appropriate because it looks like an official organizational account. I would like to change my username to LRODRISAC.

Thank you for taking the time to reconsider my request.

CEJILCEJIL (talk) 10:25, 5 August 2026 (UTC) | accept=Allowing username change to requested username. Please select an option from [[Wikipedia:Changing username]] and file a request as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, replacing {{subst:Decline reason here}} with any specific rationale. If you do not edit the text after "decline=", a default reason why the request was declined will be inserted.

{{unblock-un reviewed | 1=LRODRISAC | reason=Hello. I understand why my account was blocked, and I understand the concerns about my username and the conflict of interest.

I work for CEJIL. I edited the article about Viviana Krsticevic because she is the Executive Director of CEJIL and I noticed that the article contained outdated information and parts that were not well written. My intention was to correct and update factual information, not to advertise or promote CEJIL or Ms. Krsticevic.

I now understand that, because I work for CEJIL, I should be more careful when editing articles related to the organization or its staff. In the future, when I need to suggest corrections to those articles, I will use the article talk pages and provide reliable independent sources so that other editors can review the proposed changes.

I also understand that the username "CEJILCEJIL" was not appropriate because it looks like an official organizational account. I would like to change my username to LRODRISAC.

Thank you for taking the time to reconsider my request.

CEJILCEJIL (talk) 10:25, 5 August 2026 (UTC) | decline={{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

This looks to be again LLM-generated, either wholly (per Quillbot) or mostly (per ZeroGPT). --DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:35, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

• To this user, if your English skill is such that you cannot edit without using a LLM to translate, you should instead edit the version of Wikipedia that is in your primary language. This way you will not struggle to understand or to be understood. 331dot (talk) 11:07, 5 August 2026 (UTC)