Jump to content

User talk:AlphaBeta135

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Operation Radiance 2026?

[edit]

Will you continue Operation Radiance for April Fools' Day 2026? ~2025-40346-02 (talk) 20:04, 7 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

"Great Meme Reset" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Great Meme Reset has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 8 § Great Meme Reset until a consensus is reached. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:37, 8 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the idea!

[edit]
The Wikipedia Quadranscentennial Barnstar
Saw your mockup on the WP:25 birthday wishes list and thought it was great! - TheWanderingTraders (talk) 00:24, 21 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Idea for next signature on April Fools Day

[edit]

Could you do your signature as a Chicago ‘L’ station sign next April Fools? Carson004 (talk) 12:10, 1 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Apologies for AFD

[edit]

I would like to apologies for that response on the AFD nomination for We Didn't Start the Fire. Although it was not an exact copy of the lyrics, I'll admit I overdid it and such an incident will not happen again. Yes I am a nerd -XCBRO172 (How could you tell?) 00:53, 2 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Operation Radiance AfD count for 2026

[edit]

How many joke AfDs did you make for this year? I'm currently writing up the lede summary for April Fools' Day 2026, although I've been having trouble getting a number for your nominations. Also, congrats on winning the Tom-Fool Award. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 01:40, 5 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

2 OpeRa nominations, but I am not continuing OpeRa. As for nomination count in 2026, put this in the search bar: insource:"Wikipedia April Fools' Day 2026" insource:"αβ135" prefix:"Wikipedia:" (Note: this query searches for joke nominations where I have some involvement, not just nominations I created). AlphaBeta135talk 01:51, 5 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

The "Tom-Fool" Barnstar

[edit]
The "Tom-Fool" Award 🤡
This barnstar has been awarded to User:AlphaBeta135 for being voted this year's Tom-Fool! Congratulations --Diriector_Doc├─────┤TalkContribs 16:54, 5 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Why haven’t you gotten the April Fools Day2026 participation thing yet?

[edit]

I have it and we're closing in on May 2026 now and you haven't got it yet. Why is that? Carson004 (talk) 21:16, 19 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive

[edit]
Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive:

Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?

  • On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed.
  • Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points!

Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.

Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Weaver line has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Weaver line. Thanks! Cheerio, Mattdaviesfsic. Talk to me. 19:52, 3 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

"Congestion Charge Zone" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

The redirect Congestion Charge Zone has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 July 6 § Congestion Charge Zone until a consensus is reached. ScalarFactor (talk) 17:28, 6 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Proposed expansion of the Chicago "L" (July 29)

[edit]
Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, AirshipJungleman29, left the following feedback:
This draft does not have sufficient content to warrant a standalone article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Chicago "L"#Planned extensions.
  • Edit the existing article to include your text and citations into an appropriate section.
  • If the article is protected and you cannot edit it, propose your changes on the article's Talk page.

Next steps

Need help?

Scam warning

~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:27, 29 July 2026 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, AlphaBeta135!

Having a draft declined at Articles for creation can be disappointing, but don't be discouraged, it's common when creating your first article.

Need help?

  • To understand why your draft was declined, please read the reviewer's feedback and follow any links to help pages you've been given. If you're still confused, try asking for advice at the Articles for creation Help desk.